This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 11, 2026. It is now read-only.
Remove procedure language#1061
Open
tomjaguarpaw wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
|
|
Collaborator
Author
|
cc @awf |
awf
approved these changes
Sep 13, 2021
awf
left a comment
awf
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved, I am trying to figure out the CI.
Contributor
|
If you get a chance, could you merge with master, and then try again? Thanks! |
Collaborator
Author
|
Sure. Could you please add this account as a collaborator? |
Contributor
|
Thanks, and done. |
Contributor
|
Let's retry when #1064 is merged. The new scenario here is PR from a fork, which we should support, so using this as a test case. Thanks for your patience! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Shall we get rid of the procedure language stuff? It's irrelevant given that we have "BOG-style AD for ksc" (which is better).